Showing posts with label Roy Halladay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roy Halladay. Show all posts

Sunday, August 07, 2011

August 8th Simulations



Putrid vs Goliath ...


Phillies vs Dodgers
Roy Halladay vs Hiroki Kuroda
Favorite: Phillies ML: -159 +154, 61.01% Simulator: 60.79%
Vegas Over/Under: 6.0 Over -102 Under -108
Simulator Over/Under: 6.63 Over: 50.96% Under: 49.04% Result: OVER
Final Score: #21 PHI 5-3

Visitors Home Probable Pitching Matchup Favorite Vegas Win Prob Simulator Win Prob Final Score
Pirates Giants C.Morton vs R.Vogelsong Giants 62.76% 61.56% TBD
Red Sox Twins T.Wakefield vs S.Baker Red Sox 54.22% 43.51% TBD
Astros DBacks W.Rodriguez vs D.Hudson DBacks 62.89% 67.31% TBD
Nationals Cubs C.Wang vs M.Garza Cubs 64.22% 64.55% TBD
Braves Marlins D.Lowe vs B.Hand Braves 52.04% 52.11% TBD
Padres Mets T.Stauffer vs M.Pelfrey Padres 50.62% 50.96% TBD
Royals Rays L.Hochevar vs J.Hellickson Rays 61.69% 60.48% TBD
Rockies Reds J.Hammel vs H.Bailey Reds 53.60% 53.63% TBD
Mariners Rangers C.Furbush vs M.Harrison Rangers 68.05% 69.58% TBD
White Sox Orioles J.Danks vs J.Guthrie White Sox 53.16% 46.39% TBD


MLB Scoreboard
Roster Help from MLB Depthcharts
Today's Lineups
Recent Bullpen Usage
Live MLB Lines

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Vegas Loves These Pitchers




This blog entry was inspired by a discussion at The Book Blog regarding how often the Phillies were the favorite team to win in Vegas when Roy Halladay was pitching based on an arbitrary opponent. I took it a step further and looked at the actual empirical data from the 2011 season. Then I took things another step further and looked at a few other pitchers of interest. Below are the results.

PitcherGSFavoredUnderdogFave %MaxMinAverageActual Win%
Roy Halladay17170100.0070.5951.2263.8582.35
C.C. Sabathia17170100.0067.2152.4961.0970.59
Jon Lester16160100.0069.4251.160.7956.25
Cliff Lee17170100.0069.751.160.3464.71
Justin Verlander1715288.2465.8141.4957.0964.71
Cole Hamels1614287.5068.7547.2859.5768.75
Tommy Hanson1614287.5069.2348.1958.162.5
Tim Lincecum1614287.5065.6448.4357.9462.5
Jered Weaver1815383.3364.8547.8556.3661.11
Jair Jurrjens1411378.5762.2642.1953.8271.43
Clayton Kershaw1712570.5965.2245.3553.9958.82
Josh Beckett1510566.6767.7437.7455.4366.67
Ian Kennedy1711664.7163.1735.450.8864.71
James Shields1610662.5064.0941.4153.5175
Anibal Sanchez1610662.5061.3935.6551.3850
Ricky Romero1811761.1160.2437.3850.1538.89


Thursday, January 20, 2011

Comparing The Talents Of National League Pitchers


Last week I looked at similarity scores between NL West starting pitchers using the stats of K/9, BB/9, GB/FB and Age. This week I am expanding my sample to include all projected National League starting pitchers. And this time I am going to narrow the stats down to the ones I feel are most reflective of a pitchers talent (K/9, BB/9, GB/FB). I tried to weight each of the three categories somewhat evenly, by using the number of standard deviations away from the mean (in each category) for each pitchers three inputs.

The way I am calculating the similarity scores is by using an X-Y-Z plot and calculating how close each pitcher is to each other in terms of distance using the three stats listed above. There is a simple formula to calculate this that we all learned in trigonometry. Dist = SQRT((X1-X2)^2 + (Y1-Y2)^2 + (Z1-Z2)^2)

The ultimate goal of each pitcher would be to score well in each of the three categories placing him in the top quadrant. A pitcher with a high K/9, low BB/9 and high GB/FB are positioned to have the most success. What really stands out before looking at any results are the numbers of Roy Halladay. His K/9 of 7.57 is above average, coming in at a modest 0.27 standard deviations above the mean. His BB/9 of 1.24 comes in at 2.65 (the best) standard deviations (to the good side) and lastly his GB/FB comes in at 1.89 standard deviations (above the mean). It is no wonder why Roy Halladay is the leagues best pitcher.

Roy Halladay (units SD)
K/9 BB/9 GB/FB
+0.27 +2.65 +1.89


Since this blog is primarily a Dodgers blog, let's take a look at the most similar NL pitchers for each of the Dodgers five starters.

Los Angeles Dodgers
Pitcher Most Similar K/9 BB/9 GB/FB Sim Score
C.Kershaw Y.Gallardo 9.65 vs 9.67 3.62 vs 3.43 1.06 vs 1.18 0.361
C.Billingsley R.Dempster 8.39 vs 8.14 3.34 vs 3.27 1.36 vs 1.41 0.223
H.Kuroda C.Carpenter 6.83 vs 6.39 2.17 vs 2.23 1.59 vs 1.81 0.539
T.Lilly S.Marcum 7.63 vs 7.65 2.23 vs 2.18 0.74 vs 0.94 0.404
J.Garland L.Hernandez 4.84 vs 4.91 2.83 vs 2.89 1.33 vs 1.15 0.371


A fair conclusion to come to from this, is to say that the Dodgers starting rotation of Kershaw, Billingsley, Kuroda, Lilly and Garland is equal to in terms of 2011 projected talent as a rotation of Gallardo, Dempster, Carpenter, Marcum and Hernandez. This leads to the very interesting question of, which of those two rotations would you rather want for the 2011 season, all other things (salary, age, etc...) being equal?

Here is a quick look at the rest of the National League starters with each pitchers closest comparable NL pitcher and their similarity score (lowest is closest).

NL Starting Pitchers - Similarity Scores
Pitcher Most Similar K/9 BB/9 GB/FB Sim Score
T.Lincecum Y.Gallardo 9.95 vs 9.67 3.01 vs 3.43 1.37 vs 1.18 0.733
B.Zito K.Correia 6.46 vs 6.60 3.72 vs 3.56 0.89 vs 1.14 0.555
M.Cain A.Harang 7.51 vs 7.38 2.66 vs 2.69 0.80 vs 0.93 0.277
J.Sanchez B.Norris 9.49 vs 8.95 4.33 vs 4.33 0.98 vs 1.04 0.392
M.Bumgarner J.Hammel 7.23 vs 7.25 2.43 vs 2.27 1.23 vs 1.33 0.302
U.Jimenez J.Chacin 8.59 vs 9.06 3.59 vs 3.83 1.64 vs 1.45 0.604
J.de la Rosa J.Chacin 8.64 vs 9.06 4.03 vs 3.83 1.31 vs 1.45 0.493
J.Hammel M.Bumgarner 7.25 vs 7.23 2.27 vs 2.43 1.33 vs 1.23 0.302
A.Cook T.Hudson 3.97 vs 5.63 2.78 vs 2.79 2.44 vs 2.60 1.191
J.Chacin J.de la Rosa 9.06 vs 8.64 3.83 vs 4.03 1.45 vs 1.31 0.493
I.Kennedy J.McDonald 7.97 vs 8.52 3.28 vs 3.48 0.84 vs 0.82 0.477
D.Hudson M.Cain 8.01 vs 7.51 2.69 vs 2.66 0.72 vs 0.80 0.383
J.Saunders R.Dickey 5.40 vs 5.42 2.85 vs 2.69 1.27 vs 1.39 0.330
B.Enright B.Arroyo 5.81 vs 5.38 2.25 vs 2.58 0.70 vs 1.01 0.830
Z.Duke R.Dickey 4.66 vs 5.42 2.46 vs 2.69 1.60 vs 1.39 0.747
M.Latos C.Hamels 9.18 vs 8.56 2.53 vs 2.32 1.03 vs 1.06 0.526
C.Richard J.Jurrjens 6.50 vs 6.54 3.25 vs 3.17 1.43 vs 1.26 0.357
T.Stauffer D.Moseley 6.05 vs 5.69 3.03 vs 3.06 1.31 vs 1.39 0.298
A.Harang J.Cueto 7.38 vs 7.16 2.69 vs 2.76 0.93 vs 1.02 0.255
D.Moseley T.Stauffer 5.69 vs 6.05 3.06 vs 3.03 1.39 vs 1.31 0.298
R.Halladay H.Kuroda 7.57 vs 6.83 1.24 vs 2.17 2.18 vs 1.59 1.786
C.Lee R.Nolasco 7.59 vs 8.82 1.30 vs 2.03 0.91 vs 0.95 1.254
R.Oswalt J.Hammel 7.54 vs 7.25 2.34 vs 2.27 1.48 vs 1.33 0.373
C.Hamels Z.Greinke 8.56 vs 8.55 2.32 vs 2.23 1.06 vs 1.01 0.162
J.Blanton M.Bumgarner 6.55 vs 7.23 2.50 vs 2.43 1.20 vs 1.23 0.484
T.Hudson J.Westbrook 5.63 vs 5.83 2.79 vs 2.97 2.60 vs 2.65 0.308
T.Hanson J.Vazquez 8.33 vs 7.68 2.67 vs 2.80 0.99 vs 0.96 0.490
D.Lowe J.Westbrook 6.26 vs 5.83 2.70 vs 2.97 3.08 vs 2.65 0.983
J.Jurrjens C.Richard 6.54 vs 6.50 3.17 vs 3.25 1.26 vs 1.43 0.357
M.Minor D.Hudson 8.74 vs 8.01 3.00 vs 2.69 0.73 vs 0.72 0.671
J.Johnson C.Hamels 8.96 vs 8.56 2.32 vs 2.32 1.45 vs 1.06 0.409
R.Nolasco C.Hamels 8.82 vs 8.56 2.03 vs 2.32 0.95 vs 1.06 0.361
J.Vazquez A.Harang 7.68 vs 7.38 2.80 vs 2.69 0.96 vs 0.93 0.267
A.Sanchez C.Billingsley 7.57 vs 8.39 3.51 vs 3.34 1.15 vs 1.36 0.606
C.Volstad D.Moseley 5.76 vs 5.69 3.34 vs 3.06 1.51 vs 1.39 0.467
J.Santana A.Harang 6.99 vs 7.38 2.46 vs 2.69 0.87 vs 0.93 0.441
M.Pelfrey D.Moseley 5.44 vs 5.69 2.99 vs 3.06 1.63 vs 1.39 0.517
J.Niese B.Myers 7.49 vs 7.44 3.06 vs 2.77 1.48 vs 1.46 0.416
R.Dickey J.Saunders 5.42 vs 5.40 2.69 vs 2.85 1.39 vs 1.27 0.330
C.Young C.Narveson 7.63 vs 7.45 3.70 vs 3.70 0.54 vs 0.87 0.667
L.Hernandez J.Garland 4.91 vs 4.84 2.89 vs 2.83 1.15 vs 1.33 0.371
J.Lannan P.Maholm 4.66 vs 4.95 3.21 vs 3.01 1.83 vs 1.84 0.349
J.Marquis J.Lannan 4.89 vs 4.66 3.43 vs 3.21 1.58 vs 1.83 0.608
J.Zimmerman W.Rodriguez 8.30 vs 8.40 2.86 vs 2.94 1.33 vs 1.26 0.143
T.Gorzelanny H.Bailey 8.00 vs 7.54 3.88 vs 3.93 1.06 vs 1.20 0.429
C.Carpenter H.Kuroda 6.39 vs 6.83 2.23 vs 2.17 1.81 vs 1.59 0.539
A.Wainwright J.Johnson 8.41 vs 8.96 2.24 vs 2.32 1.50 vs 1.45 0.409
K.Lohse B.Arroyo 5.50 vs 5.38 2.71 vs 2.58 1.12 vs 1.01 0.298
J.Westbrook T.Hudson 5.83 vs 5.63 2.97 vs 2.79 2.65 vs 2.60 0.308
J.Garcia J.Westbrook 7.30 vs 5.83 3.39 vs 2.97 2.29 vs 2.65 1.379
E.Volquez B.Norris 9.43 vs 8.95 4.68 vs 4.33 1.34 vs 1.04 0.845
B.Arroyo K.Lohse 5.38 vs 5.50 2.58 vs 2.71 1.01 vs 1.12 0.298
J.Cueto A.Harang 7.16 vs 7.38 2.76 vs 2.69 1.02 vs 0.93 0.255
T.Wood I.Kennedy 7.61 vs 7.97 3.14 vs 3.28 0.63 vs 0.84 0.522
H.Bailey T.Gorzelanny 7.54 vs 8.00 3.93 vs 3.88 1.20 vs 1.06 0.429
Z.Greinke C.Hamels 8.55 vs 8.56 2.23 vs 2.32 1.01 vs 1.06 0.162
Y.Gallardo C.Kershaw 9.67 vs 9.65 3.43 vs 3.62 1.18 vs 1.06 0.361
S.Marcum T.Lilly 7.65 vs 7.63 2.18 vs 2.23 0.94 vs 0.74 0.404
R.Wolf R.Ohlendorf 6.45 vs 6.48 3.32 vs 3.24 0.95 vs 0.92 0.130
C.Narveson T.Gorzelanny 7.45 vs 8.00 3.70 vs 3.88 0.87 vs 1.06 0.594
R.Dempster C.Billingsley 8.14 vs 8.39 3.27 vs 3.34 1.41 vs 1.36 0.223
R.Wells T.Stauffer 6.57 vs 6.05 2.76 vs 3.03 1.43 vs 1.31 0.577
M.Garza N.Figueroa 7.38 vs 7.04 2.94 vs 3.00 1.16 vs 1.05 0.332
C.Zambrano J.de la Rosa 7.92 vs 8.64 4.23 vs 4.03 1.51 vs 1.31 0.698
C.Silva H.Kuroda 5.63 vs 6.83 1.94 vs 2.17 1.51 vs 1.59 0.895
P.Maholm J.Lannan 4.95 vs 4.66 3.01 vs 3.21 1.84 vs 1.83 0.349
R.Ohlendorf R.Wolf 6.48 vs 6.45 3.24 vs 3.32 0.92 vs 0.95 0.130
C.Morton C.Richard 6.51 vs 6.50 3.64 vs 3.25 1.55 vs 1.43 0.604
J.McDonald I.Kennedy 8.52 vs 7.97 3.48 vs 3.28 0.82 vs 0.84 0.477
K.Correia R.Wolf 6.60 vs 6.45 3.56 vs 3.32 1.14 vs 0.95 0.520
W.Rodriguez J.Zimmerman 8.40 vs 8.30 2.94 vs 2.86 1.26 vs 1.33 0.193
B.Myers J.Niese 7.44 vs 7.49 2.77 vs 3.06 1.46 vs 1.48 0.416
J.Happ T.Gorzelanny 7.87 vs 8.00 4.15 vs 3.88 0.87 vs 1.06 0.546
B.Norris J.Sanchez 8.95 vs 9.49 4.33 vs 4.33 1.04 vs 0.98 0.392
N.Figueroa M.Garza 7.04 vs 7.38 3.00 vs 2.94 1.05 vs 1.16 0.332


There are some interesting results here. The two pitchers with the closest similarity scores are Randy Wolf (MIL) and Ross Ohlendorf (PIT) with a score of 0.130. Zack Greinke and Cole Hamels have a score of 0.162, the lowest score of what I would call upper tier pitchers. There are a few pitchers like Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee and Jaime Garcia who don't have any worthwhile comparables, usually from being outliers in more than one category. If you are interested in the complete spreadsheet of all the comparables, please write me an email (xeifrank-yahoo-com) or leave a comment.

Summary Statistics
Statistic Result
Average K/9 7.14
Stdev K/9 1.45
Average BB/9 2.98
Stdev BB/9 0.70
Average GB/FB 1.32
Stdev GB/FB 0.50


MLB Picks